Free Speech
FSA Ticket | Today | Join | Member | Search | Who's On | Help | Sign In | |
FSA > Theology and Spirtuality > This life and the after life Go to subcategory:
Author Content
Tomlapaz
  • From:USA

Date Posted:18-06-2018 05:00:19Copy HTML

The risk of posting something like this is that, folk will read into this and not give it thought.  If they read it at all.

But, hopefully, some will find it informative, even if they do not agree.

Bottom line - Jesus is the Way, the Truth and the Life.  He alone  can save us from our personal evil.   We have that on one side.   Everything else falls into a 2nd category, which can be broken down further - all of which are derived from man's sin.


https://answersingenesis.org/sanctity-of-life/other-religions-view-human-life-versus-gods-view-human-life/?utm_source=articlesmedia&utm_medium=email&utm_content=2-banner-cta&utm_campaign=20180120&mc_cid=4a46b359e4&mc_eid=cab2b47150

There are ultimately only two religions in the world: God’s and man’s. God’s religion is the truth because God is truth. God revealed the truth to us in his Word. The Word of God, the 66 books of the Bible, is true by virtue of it coming from God who is the truth.

Man’s religion, on the other hand, uses the mind of man, which is naturally rebellious to God because of sin (Genesis 6:5; Psalm 14:1–4, 58:3; Isaiah 53:6; Romans 1:28; Ephesians 2:1–3), to attempt to supersede the Word of God. In simplistic terms, it means that man’s opinions are elevated to be greater than God’s Word. This is humanism in its broadest sense. So the two competing religions are biblical Christianity and human-based religions (humanism).

Humanism breaks into four types of religions that try to compete with biblical Christianity by elevating man’s ideas and demoting God’s Word. And these four break down into further variations. The four, with examples, are

  1. Materialistic religions—only material exists; no spiritual/nonmaterial. For example, secularism, naturalism, atheism, agnosticism, modernism, post-modernism, Epicureanism.

  2. Spiritual religions— also called mysticism or transcendent mysticism or Eastern religions where only spirit exists; no material things exist. You are merely deceived into thinking material things exist. These religions include Taoism, Hinduism, Jainism, New Age.

  3. Moralistic religions—suggested moral codes, but no absolutes. For example, paganism, Confucianism, witchcraft, Wicca, animism/spiritism, Shinto, ancestor mythologies, Buddhism.

  4. Counterfeits of Christianity—something that mimics Christianity, but deviates due to someone’s contrary claims. For example, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Islam, Mormonism, Judaism.

Naturally these human-based religions break into further subdivisions. But because of the elevation of ideas and opinions of man as the truth, these religions deviate from the absolute truth of God’s Word.

Jesus: For if you believed Moses, you would believe me; for he wrote of me. But if you believe not his writings, how shall you believe my words? Psalm 37:21 The wicked borrows and does not pay back, But the righteous is gracious and gives.
skwanderer Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #121
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:03-07-2018 07:50:10Copy HTML

 So you keep telling us BUT I have shown you to be in contradiction to Einstein and Kaku

_________


Further to Wale's mental illness......I have disagreed with nothing stated by Einstein or Kaku, who both say there is no proof of god, and who both accept evolutionary science as fact.

You are unwell Wale.


"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment." Albert Einstein
skwanderer Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #122
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:03-07-2018 07:51:56Copy HTML

 above me in "the scientific field".    lolololololololol

What field?  "the field".    lololol

 I am above both of them in my field.  In any event I agree with them.  How about you?  Do you agree there is no proof of god and evolution is real like they do???

"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment." Albert Einstein
wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #123
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:04-07-2018 01:11:53Copy HTML

Reply to skwanderer

 above me in "the scientific field".    lolololololololol

What field?  "the field".    lololol

 I am above both of them in my field.  In any event I agree with them.  How about you?  Do you agree there is no proof of god and evolution is real like they do???


You do NOT agree with them as THEY see a HAND behind the design whereas YOU reject that thinking, been shown to you MANY times.

YOU are NOT a greater scientist than Kaku and Einstein as they see the LARGER picture, the grand scope and you are very limited in your view and thinking.

wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #124
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:04-07-2018 01:29:56Copy HTML

Reply to Bogupumped

LOL

"...According to the American Psychiatric Association, until 1974 homosexuality was a mental illness.  Freud had alluded to homosexuality numerous times in his writings, and had concluded that paranoia and homosexuality were inseparable.  Other psychiatrists wrote copiously on the subject, and homosexuality was “treated” on a wide basis.  There was little or no suggestion within the psychiatric community that homosexuality might be conceptualized as anything other than a mental illness that needed to be treated.  And, of course, homosexuality was listed as a mental illness in DSM-II.  (The DSM – Diagnostic and Statistical Manual – is the APA’s standard classification of their so-called mental disorders, and is used by many mental health workers in the USA and other countries.).........What’s noteworthy about this is that the removal of homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses was not triggered by some scientific breakthrough.  There was no new fact or set of facts that stimulated this major change.  Rather, it was the simple reality that gay people started to kick up a fuss.  They gained a voice and began to make themselves heard.  And the APA reacted with truly astonishing speed.  And with good reason. They realized intuitively that a protracted battle would have drawn increasing attention to the spurious nature of their entire taxonomy.  So they quickly “cut loose” the gay community and forestalled any radical scrutiny of the DSM system generally.....So all the people who had this terrible “illness” were “cured” overnight – by a vote!  I remember as a boy reading of the United Nations World Health Organization’s decision to eradicate smallpox.  This was in 1967, and by 1977, after a truly staggering amount of work, the disease was a thing of the past.  Why didn’t they just take a vote?  Because smallpox is a real illness.  The human problems listed in DSM are not.  It’s that simple.  You can say that geese are swans – but in reality they’re still geese...."

http://behaviorismandmentalhealth.com/2011/10/08/homosexuality-the-mental-illness-that-went-away/ 

LOL

wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #125
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:04-07-2018 03:15:39Copy HTML

Reply to Boguspumped

LOL

Freud had alluded to homosexuality numerous times in his writings, and had concluded that paranoia and homosexuality were inseparable. LOL

wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #126
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:04-07-2018 03:27:29Copy HTML

Reply to Boguspumped

LOL


So all the people who had this terrible “illness” of homosexuality, were “cured” overnight – by a vote!  LOL
Bogus0Pomp Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #127
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:04-07-2018 03:49:16Copy HTML

LOL

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z "If you can read these 26 letters, there is nothing about the universe that you can't learn." -- Lambros D. Callimoahos
skwanderer Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #128
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:04-07-2018 08:09:48Copy HTML

 You do NOT agree with them as THEY see a HAND behind the design whereas YOU reject that thinking, been shown to you MANY times.

__ 

They see a hand, great.  I too see amazing things.  But all three of us guys you love to talk about and who are well known scientists (versus you who are a fuck-all nobody) agree there is no proof of this hand, and evolution is a fact.

Get on board with us smart guys Wale.


"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment." Albert Einstein
wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #129
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:04-07-2018 10:33:30Copy HTML

Reply to skwanderer

 You do NOT agree with them as THEY see a HAND behind the design whereas YOU reject that thinking, been shown to you MANY times.

__ 

They see a hand, great.  I too see amazing things.  But all three of us guys you love to talk about and who are well known scientists (versus you who are a fuck-all nobody) agree there is no proof of this hand, and evolution is a fact.

Get on board with us smart guys Wale.



You must have been denied quite a bit as a child because you continually repeat your nonsense as if that will establish your nonsense which you probably did a lot as a child and carried that to your adulthood. YOU don't say, and never have , that you see a hand behind the deign as EINSTEIN and KAKU have and THESE guys are of MUCH greater accomplishment than YOU. Must eat at you constantly.
skwanderer Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #130
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:04-07-2018 11:37:01Copy HTML

 I repeat facts.  Kaku and Einstein both have said there is no proof of god.  Einstein went further and called your bible childish fables.  They bath accept evoltution.  I don't care if they believe in god or not.  We are in alignment.  That is a fact.

How about you?  Why don't you agree with Einstein and Kaku that evolution is true and there is no proof of god?


"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment." Albert Einstein
wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #131
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 03:12:46Copy HTML

Reply to skdoodle

 I repeat facts.  Kaku and Einstein both have said there is no proof of god.  Einstein went further and called your bible childish fables.  They bath accept evoltution.  I don't care if they believe in god or not.  We are in alignment.  That is a fact.

How about you?  Why don't you agree with Einstein and Kaku that evolution is true and there is no proof of god?



No you don't. You repeat childish wants of yours. You cannot be in alignment with Einstein and Kaku if what YOU say is DIFFERENT than what THEY say.

Einstein and Kaku, as per concluding based on THEIR observation and greater understanding than YOU, see that the universe is MARVELOUSLY ARRANGED. You don't because you are an idiot posing as an intellect, having to grasp on the shoestring of  scientists who are way ABOVE you.

In an interview published in George Sylvester Viereck's book Glimpses of the Great (1930), Einstein responded to a question about whether or not he defined himself as a pantheist. He explained:

...It is not a question I can answer simply with yes or no. I am not an Atheist. I do not know if I can define myself as a Pantheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. .... The human mind, no matter how highly trained, cannot grasp the universe.

We are in the position of a little child, entering a huge library whose walls are covered to the ceiling with books in many different tongues. The child knows that someone must have written those books. It does not know who or how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written.

The child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books, a mysterious order, which it does not comprehend, but only dimly suspects. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of the human mind, even the greatest and most cultured, toward God.

We see a universe marvelously arranged, obeying certain laws, but we understand the laws only dimly. Our limited minds cannot grasp the mysterious force that sways the constellations. I am fascinated by Spinoza's Pantheism. I admire even more his contributions to modern thought. Spinoza is the greatest of modern philosophers, because he is the first philosopher who deals with the soul and the body as one, not as two separate things.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_and_philosophical_views_of_Albert_Einstein#Personal_God

Yobbo Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #132
  • From:New_zealand

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 05:32:35Copy HTML

No, you Wale, have heard a little of what Kaku and Einstein have written and divined from that something you want to believe.  And that has little to nothing to do with what they were saying.
"Les hommes ne font jamais le mal si complètement et joyeusement que lorsqu'ils le font par conviction religieuse." Blaise Pascal
wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #133
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 12:04:16Copy HTML

Reply to Yobbo

No, you Wale, have heard a little of what Kaku and Einstein have written and divined from that something you want to believe.  And that has little to nothing to do with what they were saying.


Then you are just as stupid as skdoodle because you can HEAR what Kaku actually SAYS in this VIDEO :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hi6yPJvCFU0

wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #134
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 12:09:08Copy HTML

Reply to Yobbo

No, you Wale, have heard a little of what Kaku and Einstein have written and divined from that something you want to believe.  And that has little to nothing to do with what they were saying.


YOU are also brave to make comments where I can't post BUT in rebuttal to your STUPIDITY over there, here is my response OVER HERE:

" No argument that he is a pain over a variety of theological subjects and deserves what you delivered."

What you call a "pain" on a variety of subjects is simply your discomfort with the limitations on what you really don't know and having that exposed and corrected.

Bogus0Pomp Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #135
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 12:50:58Copy HTML

Reply to Yobbo

No, you Wale, have heard a little of what Kaku and Einstein have written and divined from that something you want to believe.  And that has little to nothing to do with what they were saying.

You are exactly right, Yobbo.  He cherry picks what he wants to hear, that which he can twistedly infer as supportive of his beliefs.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z "If you can read these 26 letters, there is nothing about the universe that you can't learn." -- Lambros D. Callimoahos
skwanderer Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #136
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 01:36:36Copy HTML

This remains true and will always remain true.     Kaku and Einstein both have said there is no proof of god.  Einstein went further and called the bible childish fables.  They both accept evolution.  I don't care if they believe in god or not.  We are in alignment.  That is a fact.

How about you Wale?  Why don't you agree with Einstein and Kaku that evolution is true and there is no proof of god?

"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment." Albert Einstein
wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #137
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 05:50:28Copy HTML

Reply to skdoodle

This remains true and will always remain true.     Kaku and Einstein both have said there is no proof of god.  Einstein went further and called the bible childish fables.  They both accept evolution.  I don't care if they believe in god or not.  We are in alignment.  That is a fact.

How about you Wale?  Why don't you agree with Einstein and Kaku that evolution is true and there is no proof of god?


 You repeat childish wants of yours in the FACE of words that contradict you.. You cannot be in alignment with Einstein and Kaku if what YOU say is DIFFERENT than what THEY say.

Einstein and Kaku, as per concluding based on THEIR observation and greater understanding than YOU, see that the universe is MARVELOUSLY ARRANGED. You don't because you are an idiot posing as an intellect, having to grasp on the shoestring of  scientists who are way ABOVE you.

In an interview published in George Sylvester Viereck's book Glimpses of the Great (1930), Einstein responded to a question about whether or not he defined himself as a pantheist. He explained:

...It is not a question I can answer simply with yes or no. I am not an Atheist. I do not know if I can define myself as a Pantheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. .... The human mind, no matter how highly trained, cannot grasp the universe.

We are in the position of a little child, entering a huge library whose walls are covered to the ceiling with books in many different tongues. The child knows that someone must have written those books. It does not know who or how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written.

The child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books, a mysterious order, which it does not comprehend, but only dimly suspects. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of the human mind, even the greatest and most cultured, toward God.

We see a universe marvelously arranged, obeying certain laws, but we understand the laws only dimly. Our limited minds cannot grasp the mysterious force that sways the constellations. I am fascinated by Spinoza's Pantheism. I admire even more his contributions to modern thought. Spinoza is the greatest of modern philosophers, because he is the first philosopher who deals with the soul and the body as one, not as two separate things.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_and_philosophical_views_of_Albert_Einstein#Personal_God


skwanderer Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #138
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 06:18:37Copy HTML

 

Einstein even talks about naïve idiots like Wale.

_______________________


Scientists believe that every occurrence, including the affairs of human beings, is due to the laws of nature. Therefore a scientist cannot be inclined to believe that the course of events can be influenced by prayer, that is, by a supernaturally manifested wish.

However, we must concede that our actual knowledge of these forces is imperfect, so that in the end the belief in the existence of a final, ultimate spirit rests on a kind of faith. Such belief remains widespread even with the current achievements in science. 

But also, everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that some spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe, one that is vastly superior to that of man. In this way the pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling of a special sort, which is surely quite different from the religiosity of someone more naive. 

With cordial greetings, 

your A. Einstein

"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment." Albert Einstein
wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #139
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 06:18:56Copy HTML

Reply to Boguspumped

 
                                                    LOL

 

Must mean something inside your INVERTED existence and thinking. LOL
skwanderer Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #140
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 06:20:48Copy HTML

 

 "The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can change this for me," Einstein wrote in January of 1954

Experts clarify that when Einstein referred to God in his own writings, he used the concept more as a metaphor than as a statement of faith. "When Einstein spoke of God, he merely meant that the universe is under the sway of absolute, pervasive, and permanent laws," wrote physicist Hans C. Ohanian.

When Einstein said things like "When I assess a theory, I ask myself, if I was God, would I have arranged the universe in this way?" he wasn't actually suggesting that the universe was built by an omnipotent being; he was instead trying to integrate scientific theories into his understanding of how the universe works already. You could call him a deist, or maybe an agnostic like Sagan. But he was neither a true believer nor an avowed atheist.

https://curiosity.com/topics/was-albert-einstein-an-atheist-curiosity/

"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment." Albert Einstein
skwanderer Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #141
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 06:21:21Copy HTML

 I am honored to think so much like Einstein, don't you think so Wale?  We are like peas in a pod.


"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment." Albert Einstein
wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #142
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 06:25:59Copy HTML

Reply to skdummy

 I am honored to think so much like Einstein, don't you think so Wale?  We are like peas in a pod.



YOUR insecurity much be so VAST that you don't see that your differences are not similarities dummy.
wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #143
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 06:29:38Copy HTML

Reply to skdopey 

 

 "The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can change this for me," Einstein wrote in January of 1954

Experts clarify that when Einstein referred to God in his own writings, he used the concept more as a metaphor than as a statement of faith. "When Einstein spoke of God, he merely meant that the universe is under the sway of absolute, pervasive, and permanent laws," wrote physicist Hans C. Ohanian.

When Einstein said things like "When I assess a theory, I ask myself, if I was God, would I have arranged the universe in this way?" he wasn't actually suggesting that the universe was built by an omnipotent being; he was instead trying to integrate scientific theories into his understanding of how the universe works already. You could call him a deist, or maybe an agnostic like Sagan. But he was neither a true believer nor an avowed atheist.

https://curiosity.com/topics/was-albert-einstein-an-atheist-curiosity/


And you STILL ignore what ELSE he wrote which has been put in front of YOU. Others don';t need to translate into what THEY wish Einstein would have said. Einstein said what he MEANT he said. 

YOU are STILL  can't read:

In an interview published in George Sylvester Viereck's book Glimpses of the Great (1930), Einstein responded to a question about whether or not he defined himself as a pantheist. He explained:

 We are in the position of a little child, entering a huge library whose walls are covered to the ceiling with books in many different tongues. The child knows that someone must have written those books. It does not know who or how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books, a mysterious order, which it does not comprehend, but only dimly suspects. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of the human mind, even the greatest and most cultured, toward God. We see a universe marvelously arranged, obeying certain laws, but we understand the laws only dimly. Our limited minds cannot grasp the mysterious force that sways the constellations. I am fascinated by Spinoza's Pantheism. I admire even more his contributions to modern thought. Spinoza is the greatest of modern philosophers, because he is the first philosopher who deals with the soul and the body as one, not as two separate things.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_and_philosophical_views_of_Albert_Einstein#Personal_God


wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #144
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 06:32:10Copy HTML

Reply to Boguspumped

 

                                                LOL

Living an inverted existence is a terrible thing, just look at what it does to BOGUSPUMPED.  LOL

skwanderer Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #145
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 06:33:29Copy HTML

 YOUR insecurity much be so VAST that you don't see that your differences are not similarities dummy.

__ 

What differences?  We both talk about a higher power metaphorically, we both agree there is no evidence of a higher power, we both agree that evolution is real, we both agree that religious stories are fictitious fables written by man.


Those are the facts.  Why don't you join us smart guys?

"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment." Albert Einstein
wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #146
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 06:36:04Copy HTML

Reply to skdummy

 YOUR insecurity much be so VAST that you don't see that your differences are not similarities dummy.

__ 

What differences?  We both talk about a higher power metaphorically, we both agree there is no evidence of a higher power, we both agree that evolution is real, we both agree that religious stories are fictitious fables written by man.


Those are the facts.  Why don't you join us smart guys?


EINSTEIN and KAKU see a hand BEHIND the design based on their observations of the grand scheme and how we fit in. YOU don't. You sorry insecure self need to continue to delude yourself into thinking that different thoughts equal sameness. take your meds again.
skwanderer Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #147
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 06:39:08Copy HTML

They are free to "see" all the hands they like.  I believe Kaku sees that had as God.  People who knew Einstein knew he was only speaking metaphorically.   Both agree with me there is no proof of god and both have statetd unequivocally many times.  Both agree with me evolution is real.  Einstein agrees with me that religion is nothing more than children's fables.

This is well documented Wale, no matter how much you want to keep lying about it.....they agree with me. 

Do they also agree with you?  Do you agree there is no proof of God?  Do you agree evolution is real?  If so, you are like Einstein, Kaku and me.

If you want to be like Einstein and me, you also have to agree your bible is a fable.

Good luck.

"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment." Albert Einstein
wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #148
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 06:42:18Copy HTML

Reply to skwanderer

They are free to "see" all the hands they like.  I believe Kaku sees that had as God.  People who knew Einstein knew he was only speaking metaphorically.   Both agree with me there is no proof of god and both have statetd unequivocally many times.  Both agree with me evolution is real.  Einstein agrees with me that religion is nothing more than children's fables.

This is well documented Wale, no matter how much you want to keep lying about it.....they agree with me. 

Do they also agree with you?  Do you agree there is no proof of God?  Do you agree evolution is real?  If so, you are like Einstein, Kaku and me.

If you want to be like Einstein and me, you also have to agree your bible is a fable.

Good luck.


THEY are more accomplished and MUCH greater thinkers than you, as well as MORE accomplished in Science. You are nowhere near Einstein, although your demented mind need to attach yourself to make you feel important, as opposed to reality.
skwanderer Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #149
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:05-07-2018 06:50:26Copy HTML

 THEY are more accomplished and MUCH greater thinkers than you, as well as MORE accomplished in Science.

____


Great.....and all three of us AGREE THERE IS NO PROOF OF GOD, AND EVOLUTION IS REAL.

You should consider agreeing with your idols like I do.



"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment." Albert Einstein
wale63 Share to: Facebook Twitter MSN linkedin google yahoo #150
  • From:USA

Re:Really are only 2 religions in the world: God’s and man’s

Date Posted:06-07-2018 12:35:08Copy HTML

Reply to skdummy

 THEY are more accomplished and MUCH greater thinkers than you, as well as MORE accomplished in Science.

____


Great.....and all three of us AGREE THERE IS NO PROOF OF GOD, AND EVOLUTION IS REAL.

You should consider agreeing with your idols like I do.



Once again you resort to your juvenile tactic of repetition of your insecurity.

They SEE a HAND behind the design that YOU deny. SIMPLE as that. they, having much better perception than you understand the universe didn't just 'spring up". YOU are nowhere near their perception. You do NOT agree with them and continue to ignore what they have actually said.

Copyright © 2000-2018 Aimoo Free Forum All rights reserved.